Charlie Kirk Review

Did Tyler Robinson shoot Charlie Kirk? Who shot Charlie Kirk and why? Was Charlie Kirk a racist?

DiversityNews

5/8/20245 min read

For decades and decades FBI, DOJ, and other institutional records prove that the great majority of all political gun violence and threats come from rightwingers.

Nearly ALL, well over 98% of all threats directed towards federal officials are directed towards Democrats.

Nearly all violent threats directed towards federal judges are Democrat judges.

Nearly all bomb threats are called into black, LGBTQ or liberal institutions, schools.

Over 95% of all political gun violence was directed towards Democrats.

It's disgusting how lackadaisical the Democratic Party is in failing to communicate these most relevant facts to voters and the media.

My other video is about Charlie Kirk. People need to see Charlie saying violent things against blacks, gays, transgenders, Muslims, Arabs, immigrants.......

I'm talking about footage of Charlie actually calling for, CALLING FOR VIOLENCE against blacks, gays, transgenders, Muslims, Arabs, immigrants.

Had Charlie been touring colleges exercising his 1st Amend. right to free speech WITHOUT calling for violence in public places, I would have reminded all that however unwise and distasteful, Kirk had a 1st Amend. right to spew hate speech in public.

But that's not what happened. Charlie did in fact call for violence against non-whites, non-heteros; and now Trump, the entire Republican Party, members of the Democratic Party and the entire legacy media are highly praising a hardcore violent racist AS IF he were head of state.

What made him a violent racist? When he repeated and publicly called for violence against non-whites, non-heteros.

Democratic Party leaders Schumer and Jeffries are virtually fake opposition to the Republican Party and are NOT defending Democrats by ATTACKING REPUBLICANS FOR LYING ABOUT DEMOCRATS.

In other words, Schumer and Jeffries should hold a press conference and make a definitive announcement that Tyler Robinson was not a member of the Democratic Party and that the evidence shows that Kirk was neither Democrat nor MAGA, but was aligned with a far right white supremacist group known as Groypers, who exist within a Gen Z ideology that neither the FBI, MAGA or the media understands.

In you're interested in understanding Groypers and Tyler Robinson's relationship with Groypers, here an excellent explanation of Groypers:

I do not subscribe to the FBI's account and narrative in any aspect of the Kirk assassination for a long laundry list of damn good reasons.

My opinion is that the currently available evidence strongly indicates that someone other than the accused shot the deceased.

The FBI claims Kirk was shot from the front, in the neck, with a 30-06 rifle from about 150 yards away on top of a building and the neck wound is an entry wound.

Most firearms experts, ex-snipers, hunters claim the neck wound is definitely an exit wound and there is no physical world in which Kirk's neck wound was an entrance wound, for a list of very well known reasons.

In order to believe the FBI's story, one would have to believe that Kirk's neck wound was an entry wound - not an exit wound.

Rightwingers are already percolating about the whereabouts of the bullet and the autopsy report. What about Kirk's operating surgeon? He or she absolutely knows where Kirk's entry and exit wounds are located.

I predict outside interference and intimidation as in other political assassinations.

The additional available evidence of a different shooter is truly staggering and virtually proves the FBI's story is simply false, poorly constructed and concocted.

A criminal psychiatrist who works with these Gen Zers believes Tyler is a member of the far-right group, "Groypers" and explains Tyler and Groypers very, very well:

https://youtu.be/CJ7RWsbebp0

Personally, I do not believe Tyler shot anyone due to the staggering amount of credible evidence I have seen that Tyler did not shoot anyone but someone else did.

Not to mention that Tyler's grandmother told reporters that Tyler never owned a gun, shot a gun, or committed violence of any kind and that she could not understand why everyone is blaming Tyler. She also said that every person in their family was a Republican who voted for Trump and she doesn't even know a Democrat.

Write your text here...

Write your text here...

Why was Tyler Robinson so calm during his arraignment hearing?

Tyler was calm for the same reason Oswald was so calm when he calmly asked for an attorney to come forward: they both knew they didn't do it, both knew they were being framed, and both were acting out their role in the conspiracy.

Both were confident that the wouldn't be convicted at trial because each knew they didn't do it.

Utah Gov. Dickhead publicly bellowed about giving Tyler the death penalty, which virtually guarantees that Tyler will NOT be getting the death penalty, precisely because case law features murder cases where the prosecutor publicly stated that the prosecution would be seeking the death penalty prior to prosecution and the courts ruled such acts as fatally prejudicial and excluded the death penalty from the menu of punishments.

Bright living room with modern inventory
Bright living room with modern inventory

DiversityNews believes the FBI account and narrative is 100% false precisely because it is absolutely indisputable that Charlie's neck wound is an EXIT WOUND - NOT AN ENTRY WOUND.

It is essential that anyone seeking the veracity of the FBI's story realizes (about Charlie being shot from the front) that if his neck wound is an exit wound, then the FBI's story is categorically false.

Here's proof that Charlie's neck wound was an EXIT WOUND: (not an entry wound)

Once a Seeker of Justice realizes that Charlie's neck wound was an EXIT WOUND, then what?

Then the Seeker of Justice suddenly realizes that Tyler Robinson's life is in very grave danger - Epstein-style danger.

Legacy media reports that state prosecutors are seeking a speedy trial for Robinson and that they are seeking the death penalty........yeah but......the fact is, because the prosecution made this a death penalty case, then death penalty case law and procedures apply; which further means that this case could be on hold for a very long time while Tyler's interlocutory appeals are decided.

I am concerned the the loyal son Tyler may not get the happy ending he thought he would.

Tyler appeared unusually calm for someone being charged with Capitol Murder and a host of additional crimes; which indicates that he fervently believes that it is virtually impossible for prosecutors to convict him because Tyler KNOWS that he did not do it - just like Lee Harvey Oswald, who was calm as a cucumber and asked any attorney to come forward.

If Tyler is a willing member of the conspiracy then Tyler may have been sending his message of calm loyalty and stability to his handlers.

Oswald was calm until he wasn't.

If I were a betting man.........